Explanation: Mr. Buddha Guan: On the problem of regulating qi, there is a paragraph in the volume of "New Treatise" that makes it clear。Mr. Or in the body use, still in the realm of if bright if ignorant, so here still use guess ear。This meaning is also, ancient and modern Chinese and Western philosophers, the solution is few。There are many theories in philosophy, because the fundamental justice is not clear, but my son is not a special thing in this matter!Hope to play the whole book every word and sentence repeatedly, and then have enlightenment, do not have no opinion。If you can say something, you can use it, and you can say something right.。It is right to be rigid, but it can be said to be improper？Body, for example, open, muddy all also。The user, that is, the body appears to be an open and open。"New Theory" Every cloud "body appears as use", or cloud "body becomes use"。"Show as" the word is the most tight, fine play it!That is, it is not outside the body, for example, if the water is ice, the ice is not known outside the water。Ice has no self, its body is known as water。Therefore, the function of saving ontology is divided into two realms。The body is invisible, and when it is used, the name is open and open。A e is a phantom tangible, pseudonym is a thing。It is the body that does not give up its own nature and appear, so in the kingdom, you can speak body also。However, if one is named, the expression is applied in terms of the apparent use of the body, and is no longer in terms of the essence of theory。So its name for body, power word also。It is clear that the body is not a rigid dead body, but should be clear and open。In this reason, Joak speaks on the body, and then names this body, saying the truth, also cloud the truth。As the saying goes, never change。You play the endless change of four words, then knowledge is also the reason (the word, that is, the organization of the word;The reason for the name)。Rules into things, there are things have then (then the reason is also), can be said not reason？From its phantom seems to have the image of words (note the word phantom seems, there is no physical image。The thing that is called is the reason from which it is called。For example, man, on the one hand, is called man, and on the other, he may be called animal, man and woman, old and young, father and son, and so on。There are things in front of us, that is, there is reason in front of us。Our heart knows the environment。At this time on the heart of the words, can say that the heart is reason;(The day of Yang Mingyan) things are said, and things can be said to be rational。The world does not know that the mind is reason, as if the heart is a thing。Can go to things to find reason, this solid error。But if you take things as real things, and think that there are many reasons in things, this is a great mistake。It should be noted that things are also reason, and one cannot say that things are rational。There is another fallacy today。For the Westerners speak of universals, such as square and square, which are universals, and things that are square or round are themselves。The universal is the form in one thing, such as many large and small, or lacquer, oil, various square tables, each individual (that is, self) is real, and the universal is the common phase in the things of these individuals。This one is false。Westerners talk about logic, but regard mutual respect as a law;If square (universal also) is a law, the things of each side are formed according to the law of this side。You pie quite has this meaning。However, Feng Jun applied the logical concept to metaphysics, and then divided the truth and the reality into two realms, and [formed] the theory into an empty and empty world separated from the actual things。This is really inexplicable, and the reason is difficult to explain。
The Complete Works of Xiong Shili, Volume 8, Hubei Education Publishing House, 2001, P472-474。
Abstract: In this letter, Xiong Shili criticizes Xu Fuguan on the problem of rationalizing qi, wants to guide Xu Fuguan to read the New Theory of Only Knowledge by the method of enlightenment, and at the end of the letter, he points the criticism at Feng Youlan, who is deeply influenced by Western logic and "applies logical concepts to metaphysics"。